What is the supporters' main point?
When a number of companies tried a four-day working week with no cut in pay, the results surprised even the organisers. Most firms reported that productivity held steady or rose, and employees described lower stress and fewer sick days. Critics, however, caution against reading too much into the trials. The firms that volunteered were mostly small, office-based and already inclined to flexibility; a hospital or a factory running round the clock cannot simply close for an extra day. Others note that some staff compressed their work into longer days, which may simply move the pressure elsewhere. Supporters accept that the model will not suit every sector but argue that the trials show the five-day pattern is a habit, not a law of nature.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. The five-day week is a convention and not a necessity
- Step 1: They say the five-day pattern is a 'habit, not a law of nature'.
Answer
The five-day week is a convention and not a necessity.
Why not the others: Supporters admit the model will not suit every sector, and they do not say critics misread data or that hospitals should close.
Practise more Reading: society and technology.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed Cyprus English Language Certification (B2, C1, C2) mock tests.
More Reading: society and technology questions
- According to the passage, why might handwritten notes lead to better memory?
- What is the writer's attitude to the research on note-taking?
- The word "legible" in the passage is closest in meaning to
- What does the writer predict about the future of handwriting?
- Which of the following is NOT named in the passage as something people still write by hand?
- Why do supporters believe cities can suit bees?