Which statement reflects the writer's conclusion?
Modern life offers few opportunities to be bored: a phone is always at hand to fill any gap. Psychologists, however, suggest that boredom is not merely an annoyance but a signal that prompts us to seek something more meaningful. In experiments, people who were asked to do a dull task before a creative one often produced more original ideas than those who were not. The explanation may be that a wandering mind makes unexpected connections. Critics of this view say that the effects are small and that deliberate rest, such as a walk, may work as well as tedium. Nonetheless, there is wide agreement that constant stimulation leaves little room for reflection, and that a few empty minutes may be worth defending.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Short periods of emptiness may be worth protecting
- Step 1: Constant stimulation leaves little room for reflection.
Answer
Short periods of emptiness may be worth protecting.
Why not the others: The writer does not call for dropping phones, link boredom to intelligence or claim creative people are never bored.
Practise more Reading: society and technology.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed Cyprus English Language Certification (B2, C1, C2) mock tests.
More Reading: society and technology questions
- According to the passage, why might handwritten notes lead to better memory?
- What is the writer's attitude to the research on note-taking?
- The word "legible" in the passage is closest in meaning to
- What does the writer predict about the future of handwriting?
- Which of the following is NOT named in the passage as something people still write by hand?
- Why do supporters believe cities can suit bees?