Why does the writer say that chefs who understand the science are better placed?
A recipe is, in effect, a chemistry experiment with edible results. When bread dough is kneaded, proteins in the flour link to form a stretchy network that traps the gas produced by yeast. The browning of a steak or a loaf is not caused by burning but by the reaction of sugars with amino acids at high temperature, which creates hundreds of new flavour compounds. Even something as simple as salting an aubergine draws out moisture by osmosis, reducing bitterness and preventing it from absorbing too much oil. Chefs who understand such processes can adjust recipes with confidence, whereas those who follow instructions without knowing why often have no idea what to do when something goes wrong.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. They can adjust recipes with confidence when problems arise
- Step 1: The final sentence contrasts them with those who do not know what to do when things go wrong.
Answer
They can adjust recipes with confidence when problems arise.
Why not the others: Chefs are not said to avoid recipes, to create more flavours or to cook faster.
Practise more Reading: science, culture and everyday life.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed Cyprus English Language Certification (B2, C1, C2) mock tests.
More Reading: science, culture and everyday life questions
- What is the effect of artificial light on insects, according to research?
- Why have councils supported lamp shields and dimming?
- What does the writer suggest about the fear that dark streets increase crime?
- What characterises the most successful schemes?
- The word "indifferent" means
- What does the writer say about rising temperatures?