What was the central argument of Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' in her report on Adolf Eichmann?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Monstrous crimes can be carried out by ordinary bureaucrats
- Step 1: Covering the 1961 trial in Jerusalem, Arendt observed that Eichmann was not a demonic fanatic or psychopathic sadist. Instead, he was a terrifyingly normal, unthinking bureaucrat whose monstrous deeds stemmed from an inability to think critically from the standpoint of others. Answer: Monstrous crimes can be carried out by ordinary bureaucrats. Why not the others: "Evil is committed only by insane sadists" is the conventional assumption that Arendt's philosophical report specifically challenged and refuted; "Totalitarianism produces heroic citizens" contradicts Arendt's profound analysis of how totalitarian regimes annihilate civic moral agency; "War crimes cannot be prosecuted by courts" Arendt fully endorsed the moral and legal necessity of bringing war criminals to justice.
Practise more Political Economy, Jurisprudence and Sociolinguistics.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed State Certificate of Language Proficiency (KPG) English mock tests.
More Political Economy, Jurisprudence and Sociolinguistics questions
- In political economy, what defines a 'progressive tax system'?
- What was the primary function of the ancient Greek Panathenaic Games held in classical Athens?
- In ethical philosophy, what distinguishes 'utilitarianism' (Bentham, Mill) from 'deontology' (Kant)?
- What was the main purpose of the Delian League's common treasury initially established on the island of Delos in 478 BC?
- In literary studies, what does the technique of 'dramatic irony' entail in theatrical storytelling?
- What is the central concept of Michel Foucault's theory of 'panopticism' in modern disciplinary society?