Read the passage and determine the author's argument regarding regenerative agriculture:

"Conventional industrial tillage fractures soil aggregates and oxidizes subterranean carbon, transforming fertile topsoil into dust. In contrast, regenerative no-till farming integrated with multi-species cover cropping protects the soil biome, enhances moisture retention, and sequesters atmospheric carbon back into stable humus matrices."

The author argues that regenerative no-till farming:

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. restores soil health, improves moisture, and sequesters carbon

  1. Step 1: Analyze the positive impacts listed: no-till with cover crops 'protects the soil biome, enhances moisture retention, and sequesters atmospheric carbon back into stable humus matrices'.
  2. Step 2: The central argument is that regenerative practices restore topsoil integrity and store carbon.
Answer
restores soil health, improves moisture, and sequesters carbon.
Why not the others: 'accelerates soil erosion and releases massive plumes of carbon dioxide' describes conventional tillage, which the author condemns; 'requires heavy mechanical plowing to break down deep subterranean rocks' contradicts the 'no-till' methodology; 'completely eliminates the need for any living cover crops on fields' contradicts the explicit integration of multi-species cover crops.

Practise more Advanced Academic Discourse, Environmental Sciences, and Critical Synthesis.

Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed MUET Malaysia (Malaysian University English Test) mock tests.