Choose the grammatically accurate phrase to express a present hypothetical precondition:

________ ongoing government agricultural subsidies, rural farming collectives would be unable to absorb current global fertilizer price spikes.

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Were it not for

Answer: Were it not for. Why not the others: 'Had it not been for' and 'If it had not been for' describe past counterfactual preconditions which mismatch the present modal 'would be'; 'Should it have been for' is an ungrammatical combination of modal 'should' and perfective aspect in a conditional adjunct.
  1. Step 1: Examine the result clause: 'would be unable to absorb' describes a hypothetical present consequence (second conditional).
  2. Step 2: The inverted counterfactual structure for present time reference is 'Were it not for [noun phrase]'.

Practise more Advanced Conditionals, Inverted Conditionals, and Modality.

Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed MUET Malaysia (Malaysian University English Test) mock tests.