An economist argues that the coming minimum wage increase will not cut jobs, because earlier increases did not.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist's argument?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Earlier increases came under economic conditions much like today's
- Step 1: The argument assumes the earlier cases are a good guide. Step 2. Similar conditions support it. Answer: similar economic conditions. Why not the others: these do not help or weaken it.
Practise more Conditional Logic, Parallel Reasoning and Resolving Discrepancies.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed LSAT (Law School Admission Test) mock tests.
More Conditional Logic, Parallel Reasoning and Resolving Discrepancies questions
- All the tickets in the box are winners. This ticket is in the box. So this ticket is a winner.
Which one of the following arguments is most… - Most dogs in the park are friendly. Rex is in the park. So Rex is friendly.
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its fla… - If the budget is approved, the library will extend its hours. The library did not extend its hours.
Which one of the following must be true… - If it rains, the match is cancelled. If the match is cancelled, the tickets are refunded.
Which one of the following must be true? - Only employees with badges may enter the lab. Lena may enter the lab.
Which one of the following must be true? - If the engine is overheating, the warning light comes on. The warning light is on. So the engine is overheating.
The reasoning is flawed be…