Principle: The right of private defence does not extend to causing more harm than is necessary to defend oneself. Facts: A thief snatches Meena's bag and runs away. Meena shoots him dead from behind as he flees. Does she have the right of private defence?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. No, the harm exceeded what was necessary
- Step 1: The right of private defence ends when the threat has ended and is limited to what is reasonably needed.
Answer
No, the harm exceeded what was necessary.
Why not the others: The use of a gun is not the reason.
Practise more Criminal Law.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed CLAT UG mock tests.
More Criminal Law questions
- Principle: A person who, at the time of the act, because of unsoundness of mind is incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it is…
- Principle: A person who induces another to commit an offence, and the offence is committed in consequence, is an abettor. Facts: Rohit persu…
- Principle: Cheating requires the dishonest inducement of a person to deliver property by deceiving him. Facts: Naveen sells a fake gold chai…
- Principle: An act done by a child under seven years of age is not an offence. Facts: A six-year-old picks up a neighbour's toy and takes it…
- Principle: Theft requires a dishonest intention to take movable property out of another's possession without consent. Facts: Vikas takes an…
- Principle: Attempt to commit an offence is punishable when an act is done towards its commission, even if the offence is not completed. Fact…