Which legal doctrine did the Constitutional Court formulate in Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, requiring lawmakers to fulfill citizens' rights to be heard, considered, and explained during lawmaking?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Meaningful Public Participation (Partisipasi Masyarakat yang Bermakna)
- Step 1: In reviewing the Job Creation Law, the MK established the doctrine of meaningful participation. Step 2. The Court mandated that public participation must fulfill three prerequisites: the right to be heard (right to be heard), the right to have opinions considered (right to be considered), and the right to receive explanations (right to be explained). Answer: Meaningful Public Participation (Partisipasi Masyarakat yang Bermakna). Why not the others: The specific Indonesian jurisprudence term is meaningful participation.
Practise more Judicial System, Constitutional Court and Legal Framework.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed Indonesia General Knowledge mock tests.
More Judicial System, Constitutional Court and Legal Framework questions
- How is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia (Ketua Mahkamah Agung) officially chosen under the Supreme Court statutory framew…
- Under Article 24A, Paragraph 3 of the 1945 Constitution, what constitutional procedure governs the appointment of Supreme Court Justices (Ha…
- Under Article 24, Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, which four specialized judicial environments operate under the supreme oversight of…
- Which category of civil disputes falls under the statutory jurisdiction of the Religious Courts (Peradilan Agama) for Indonesian Muslim citi…
- What type of legal claims are adjudicated by the State Administrative Courts (Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara / PTUN) under Law No. 51/2009?
- Under Article 24C, Paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution, which of the following is an exclusive constitutional power held by the Constitutio…