Which statement would proponents be most likely to agree with? (Passage: Autonomous vehicles)
Proponents of self-driving cars argue that they will reduce road deaths, since most crashes involve human error. Opponents point out that today's systems have been tested mainly in good weather on mapped roads and that statistics from these conditions cannot simply be applied to rain, snow or unfamiliar streets. A regulator has therefore required that any company seeking approval must report separately its crash rates in each weather condition, and its distance driven in each.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Reducing human error could reduce road deaths
- Step 1: Proponents' argument. Step 2. They argue that most crashes involve human error. Answer: Reducing human error could reduce road deaths. Why not the others: Others contradict or are unrelated.
Practise more Short passages and comprehension (set 2).
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed UCAT mock tests.
More Short passages and comprehension (set 2) questions
- Why does the digit task matter to the argument? (Passage: Language and thought)
- What did the first group do better? (Passage: Language and thought)
- A reader claims: 'The experiment proves that language determines thought.' What is the correct assessment? (Passage: Language and thought)
- Which conclusion is the best supported? (Passage: Language and thought)
- What is the rival's criticism of the survey? (Passage: A retail pricing change)
- Which result occurred alongside the price change? (Passage: A retail pricing change)