The final sentence of the passage serves to
Compulsory voting is said to violate freedom, because a citizen should be as free to abstain as to vote. The objection assumes that compulsion is the same as coercion of opinion. Yet an electoral duty to attend a polling station does not require anyone to support a candidate; blank ballots are allowed in many systems. We already accept compulsory jury service, taxes and, in some countries, military conscription, which interfere with liberty far more. The case for compulsion rests on two facts: elections held with low turnout tend to be won by the groups most likely to vote, and those groups are seldom representative of the whole. It does not follow that compulsion cures disengagement, which may have deeper roots. But it removes one cause of unequal influence.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: E. limit the claim by admitting that compulsion does not address every cause of disengagement
- Step 1: The sentence grants that disengagement may have deeper roots.
- Step 2: Yet it holds that compulsion still removes one cause of unequal influence, so the claim is narrowed, not dropped.
Answer
limit the claim by admitting that compulsion does not address every cause of disengagement.
Why not the others: The author does not abandon the case, add an objection, deny disengagement or call its causes unimportant.
Practise more Elections.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed LNAT mock tests.
More Elections questions
- Which statement best captures the author's position?
- Why does the author mention eighty-year-olds?
- Which of the following is implied by the passage?
- Which objection would most damage the author's final sentence?
- What is the author's main claim?
- Which role does the reference to jury service and taxes play?