Which of the following does the author concede?
Supporters of selective schools say they give clever children from poor homes a route that comprehensive schools do not. The claim is attractive, but the evidence it needs is missing. For selection to help the poor, selective schools would have to admit many poor children, and in practice entry tests favour those whose parents can pay for coaching. The result is that selective schools tend to enrol fewer disadvantaged pupils than their local areas contain. Meanwhile, the schools left behind lose their strongest pupils and, with them, much of their academic atmosphere. It may be that some selected children do better than they otherwise would. But a system should be judged by what happens to all its pupils, and judged that way, selection is hard to defend on the ground of social mobility.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Some children who are selected may do better than they would have done elsewhere
- Step 1: The passage says 'it may be that some selected children do better than they otherwise would'.
- Step 2: That is the concession.
Answer
Some children who are selected may do better than they would have done elsewhere.
Why not the others: The author does not concede that selective schools admit many poor pupils, that other schools benefit, that mobility is the only aim of schooling or that entry tests are fair.
Practise more Education.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed LNAT mock tests.