A conspiracy theorist asserts: 'No scientist has ever disproven the existence of subterranean civilizations in Antarctica; therefore, they must exist.' Which fallacy is evident?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Appeal to ignorance claiming truth from lack of contradictory proof
- Step 1: The speaker claims subterranean civilizations exist solely because no one has produced definitive proof that they do not. Asserting that a claim must be true because it has not been proven false (or vice versa) is an appeal to ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam). Answer: Appeal to ignorance claiming truth from lack of contradictory proof. Why not the others: "Hasty generalization sample" draws a broad universal conclusion from an inadequate statistical sample; "Fallacy of division error" wrongly assumes that what is true of a whole must be true of each part; "Post hoc causal flaw" confuses chronological sequence with direct causal relationship between events.
Practise more Logical Fallacies and Argument Evaluation.
Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed State Certificate of Language Proficiency (KPG) English mock tests.
More Logical Fallacies and Argument Evaluation questions
- An editorial argues: 'If the city bans cars in the historic center, all retail shops will close, tourists will flee, and the city will becom…
- A politician states: 'We should ignore Professor Vance's economic forecast because he has never run a profitable private business.' What fla…
- A corporate executive asserts: 'Either we adopt this artificial intelligence software immediately or our company will face bankruptcy within…
- Consider the claim: 'Crime rates dropped across the metropolis after the new mayor was inaugurated; therefore, the mayor's policies reduced…
- A critic remarks: 'Proponents of solar energy want us to abandon all modern machinery and return to living in dark caves.' What reasoning er…
- A columnist writes: 'Voluntary euthanasia is morally wrong because ending a human life intentionally is ethically impermissible.' What falla…