In a sociolinguistic study on code-switching in bilingual Jakarta youth, what is the author's primary conclusion?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Alternating between Indonesian and English functions as a dynamic marker of social identity and peer solidarity

  1. Step 1: Sociolinguistic research demonstrates code-switching reflects pragmatic communicative competence and identity construction. Step 2. The author identifies code-switching as a dynamic marker of solidarity, not a deficiency. Answer: Alternating between Indonesian and English functions as a dynamic marker of social identity and peer solidarity. Why not the others: Code-switching is recognized as sophisticated communicative competence.

Practise more Academic Reading and Argument Structure.

Free questions with an explanation for every one, and full timed SIMAK UI mock tests.